This is an unfair way to treat these college students. Paragraph 2: Paying college athletes would also limit or even end corruption from such external influences as agents and boosters. While not all student-athletes are on scholarship, many are, particularly those who are playing for schools we see winning national championships. Is it every athlete playing in those sports or just the elite? They all work hard for little to no money, so why should athletes be any different? It gives student athletes a much-needed income. Should college athletes get paid? This is why the question of whether college athletes need to be compensated by their schools or not has been around for years now. To gain a good insight about this subject, let us take a look at the pros and cons of paying college athletes.
Here, as per our interest, it is sports. Affects Small Colleges Schools support their collegiate teams and this entails expenses. Early on in the day, he admonished college athletic departments for relying on direct institutional support and state government subsidies in order to operate in the black. A lot of young adults today are impatient and lack the ability to delay gratification. College sports is a rapidly growing industry in the United States. A common issue in this debate is where the money is going.
These are the sports careers that have the highest potential of glitz, glamor, and money. Body Reasons Why College Athletes Should Be Paid Paragraph 1: Since college athletics programs are geared towards turning a profit at the end in terms of the revenue generated during the programs, it would only be fair to pay the athletes involved. Why do college athletes that put in just as much work get paid differently? In the pros this is a legitimate problem because franchises cannot compete. If college athletes will be paid, there will a big dent on the finances of universities and colleges. These scholarships can cover a number of different items, such as tuition fees, room and board and course-related books. College student-athletes are given a rare opportunity. This paper argues that college students should be paid given the nature and organization of college athletics.
Oditt English Lit 04 March 2016 Paying College Athletes Paying college athletes has been frowned upon until now. Along with having their schooling paid for, it would seem very unfair in the eyes of others. Most profits from college athletics do not go towards academics. By paying them during their college days, they would begin to learn and understand how to better manage money and avoid these same mistakes. Working with a would hopefully set them up a better financial future. Besides, college athletes are being paid in a different way. Paying college athletes should not be something controversial, but something ethically right due to what they go through to get to this point.
These players, most of whom are gunning the major leagues, can be seriously hurt at any point during practice or games. I understand that some people think its a job and they should be paid but isn't a free education enough, is free apparel not enough. I still sympathize with college athletes because I use to play college football and I can tell you it's not an easy task to play sports and attend school full time. List of Cons of Paying College Athletes 1. Playing sports of any kind comes with associated risks, which is why pro athletes are some of the highest paid individuals in the industry. The first question I ask people when they say college athletes should be paid is: where is the money going to come from? The crowd these college students attract and the revenue generated is good enough for schools to kick start several important projects. Darren Heitner over at the Sports Agent Blog recently the lifting of all regulations against agents paying players.
All these questions reveal how difficult it would be to change the college athletic system to compensate college athletes. Will there be a salary cap? In the classroom, they receive special consideration like specific notes and study guides. In the long run it will just create more problems. Below are a few pros and cons of paying collegiate athletes. So, yes, they can definitely afford to pay college athletes.
This includes endorsements and incentives. People do believe that the players deserve compensation for the revenue they bring in. Moreover, students would want to take part not in sports in which they are richly talented but in sports that can guarantee better payment. However, this of course comes with certain issues, particularly when it comes to the question whether college athletes should be paid for their performance. If an outside company wants to sponsor an athlete while in college it should have to go towards the cost of their education.
There are two sides to every argument. Photo Courtesy: Becca Wyant The Breakdown So, what exactly does it mean to pay college athletes? Then, the money would be disbursed evenly throughout the school, resulting to lower tuition rates and improved school programs. Retrieved 21 November 2017, from Yankah, E. It is only fair that the player is compensated for this. Also, there is an issue on equal pay among players in different divisions. Hence, isn't it fair enough to let students get exposed to numerous experiences and choose what suits them best.